Home Categories Submit Republish Tools Links Credits Contact
Popular Articles
 
     
 
 Categories
 
 
Submit your articles online!

The “Better People” Fallacy

By: Arvind Kumar


It’s easy enough to convince your own staff that better people will prevail, even against the odds. It’s what they want to hear. And surely in a marketing war quality is a factor as well as quantity.

It is, but superiority of force is such an overwhelming advantage that it overcomes most quality differences.

We have no doubt that the poorest team in the National Football League could consistently beat the best team in the NFL if it could field 12 men against the opposition’s 11.

In business, where the teams are much larger, your ability to amass a quality difference is much more difficult.

The clear-thinking marketing manager won’t confuse the pep talk at a sales rally with the reality of the marketing area. A good general never makes military strategy based on having better personnel. Nor should a marketing general. (“Our army,” said Wellington “is composed of the scum of the earth, the mere scum of the earth.”)

Obviously you’d be in deep trouble inside your company if you used Wellington’s words to describe your own army. Tell your people how terrific they are, but don’t plan on winning the battle with superior personnel.

Count on winning the battle with a superior strategy.

Yet many companies cling deeply to the better people strategy. They’re convinced they can recruit and hire substantially better training programs can help them keep their “people” edge.

Any student of statistics would laugh at this belief. Sure, it’s possible to put together a small cadre of superior people. But the larger the company, the more likely the average employee will be average.

And when it comes to the mega companies, the possibility of assembling an intellectually superior team becomes statistically almost zero.

At last count, IBM had 369,545 employees, a number which is growing rapidly. On a one-to-one basic, there may be more white shirts at IBM but not more gray matter.

IBM is winning the computer war the Eisenhower way. Where the competition has 2, IBM has 4. Where the competition has 4, IBM has 8.

EzineArticles Expert Author Arvind Kumar

Arvind Kumar is an Electrical Engineer from a premier Institute, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India. He has 3 years experince in marketing business consulting services and marketing services. He is founder and CEO of http://www.nuttymarketer.com. You may reach him at arvind@nuttymarketer.com.



Article Source: http://www.PopularArticles.com/article27748.html




Print This Article
Post Comment
Add To Favorites
Email to Friends
Republish Article

Related Articles

Turnaround Or Terminate? How To Deal With Problem Employees - Anne Alexander
Quality Staffing: Stop Placing The Wrong People In The Wrong Jobs - Marcia Zidle
HRM: Contributing To Well-being Or Ill-being At Work? - Eddie Blass
An Original Perspective On Waging Conflict As A Way To Promote And Restore Self-dignity - Neil Warner
Try It Out On Your Team First - Larry Galler
5 Elements To Customer Service: A Fresh Look - Dr. Richard L. Williams
Lean Principles In Action - Adam Sommers
Get It Right First Time With Effective Headhunting - Paul Wilson
Teachers: Could You Use The 10 Best Classroom Management Interventions To Turnaround Problem Behavio - Ruth Wells
Does Your Organization Have A Learning Disability - Disability # 2 - The Enemy Is Out There - Graeme Nichol
   
 
 
Home | Categories | Submit | Republish | Tools | Links | Credits | Contact | Privacy Statement | Terms Of Use
Copyright © 2008 InfoServe Media, LLC (DBA PopularArticles.com). All rights reserved.